Model comparison
FLUX.2 vs Ideogram 3.0 vs Nano Banana
Three of today's leading AI image models — each with a different superpower. Here's how they stack up, and how to choose. Or skip the choice and use all three from one workspace in Visionette.
| FLUX.2 | Ideogram 3.0 | Nano Banana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Photorealism, portraits | Posters, ads with text | Speed, photo edits |
| Text rendering | Good | Excellent | Good |
| Speed | Medium | Medium | Fast |
| Photorealism | Excellent | Very good | Very good |
| Artistic styles | Wide range | Strong on graphic design | Playful, creative |
| Image editing | Limited | Limited | Excellent |
When to use FLUX.2
Pick FLUX.2 for anything that needs to look like a real photograph: portraits, product shots, editorial scenes, and cinematic compositions. It's the strongest model for skin tones, lighting, and photographic detail.
When to use Ideogram 3.0
Pick Ideogram when the image needs readable text: posters, ads, social graphics, logos, t-shirt designs. Other models still struggle with typography; Ideogram nails it.
When to use Nano Banana
Pick Nano Banana for speed, iteration, and image edits. Great for restyling photos, quick concept exploration, and creative remixes where you want 10 variations in a minute.